Democrats Shouldn't Worry About Bush
(Republicans Should...)

Devvy Kidd
December 13, 2000

Tonight Mr. Gore gave his speech. Give the Devil his due: Mr. Gore gave an excellent and I think, genuine speech--for a change. Unfortunately, even after eight years as Vice President of the United States, Gore still hasn't learned our legal form of government and called America, incorrectly, a democracy, ad nauseam. Wb'ya's speech was boiler- plate and what gripped my gut is the fact that I will have to look at his stupid and constant smirk for the next four years.

It's been bad enough viewing Clinton and his jutted chin with that disingenuous smirk plastered on his face for the past eight years. Now we've got a new flavor of smirk on a head that contains less intellectual matter than this nation deserves as it's President. Bush's speech tonight was full of the usual buzz words: "conciliatory," the silly "compassionate conservative," and "free" prescription pills for seniors (keep those old people medicated so they don't catch on to the scam!). Like Gore, Bush believes America should be governed by mob rule (democracy).

Wb'ya mouthed a phony segment about Thomas Jefferson. What an insult to Jefferson. Following his reference to our great third president, Bush lauded "our democracy." Well, Republicans, you got what you ask for, now we'll see how this "lesser of two evils" works out for you. I already know how it will play out for our Republic. Like a cartoon character, we heard "bi-partisan" at least 15 times. Smirk, smirk, yuk, yuk..The one party system doing the two-party dance--strictly for public consumption and tragically, the party faithful will go right back to sleep.

The grassroots Republicans in this country have got to wake up and recognize that your party has played you all for fools and let me give you one glaring example: when I ran for Congress, the well-meaning and very patriotic Republicans in my district were all excited about the "Contract with America". They pushed all the party faithful to watch the propaganda films put out by former House hot-shot, Newt Getrich. This guy is as evil as they come, but the party faithful either refuse to recognize this or they simply haven't had access to just how bad this guy is....here's a clue:

On 11.13.96, I spoke with the Washington, DC based Roll Call to confirm the following information which ran in the New American magazine, November 25th issue. The staff at Roll Call was very helpful in verifying the accuracy of this excerpt:

    "House Speaker New Gingrich has admitted that a hidden motive behind his 'Contract With
    America' two years ago was to control the large and stridently conservative freshman class that
    was expected to come into the house with the 1994 mid-term elections. 'Nobody fully understands
    this,' Gingrich explained in confidential tapes obtained by Roll Call, 'but if you think of the
    Contract  with America, it was, in fact, a training implementation document masquerading as
    a public relations device...It was designed as a training implementation document for the
    freshmen when they arrived...It was guaranteed that from election day through April, early April,
    that the House Republican Party would have to behave in a deviant manner from what it would
    morally be expected to do.'"

Roll Call said there was much more on these confidential tapes they managed to acquire and will be printing it in their newspaper. Got that, party faithful? You were taken for a ride. Hood-winked. Newt, a new world order lackey, got all the desperate folks that belong to the Republican Party worked into a dither of false hope with phony promises. How did Mr. Newt know enough in advance to plan this little "public relations device" even would be needed for the '94 "elections" and incoming freshmen? Because somebody whispered in his ear not to worry, there would be this "Republican revolution," and the millions would be neutralized.

For Democrats who are crushed by use of the word 'Devil' above, Al Gore is a dangerous man. He has sold us out just as egregiously as Clinton, make no mistake about it. I would highly recommend that Democrats who are upset by this phony "election" outcome and my criticism of Red Al, that you get on the Internet and read the excellent investigative pieces on web sites such as worldnetdaily.com, newsmax.com; hit a search engine or two and type in Al Gore. You will discover that this guy has never cared a whit for the common man, "people of color," or any other American. He has always been red and like a bad penny, he'll probably turn up again, much to the danger of America.

To quote Matt Drudge, October 31, 2000

New Gertz Book is a Shocker

    "A new book by Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz shows that the U.S. national security has suffered massive penetration by the Red Chinese. The Drudge Report is reporting that in "China Threat," best-selling author Bill Gertz is preparing to unleash top classified reports that detail Communist China's vast efforts to undermine and destroy the United States.

    "Classified papers from the FBI, CIA and NSA reveal that a major Chinese mole at the highest levels of the U.S. government named "Ma" has never been found."

    "Drudge also notes that Gertz published details of "a classified Chinese government document, known as Document 65, [that] reveals that China is willing to attack the United States with nuclear weapons if U.S. forces intervene to defend Taiwan in a regional conflict.

    "The book has already caused waves in the White House, and the administration may take legal action for the release of classified documents in the new book."

Think Red Al hasn't known what's been going on with this treasonous behavior by Mr. Clinton? Come on. Hang on to your hats, Republicans: GWB, Jr., has pledged that the United States (although there isn't a scintilla of constitutional authority to do so...) will defend Taiwan if China goes after them. Like father, like son. Buy clothes made in Communist China. Smooze up to them about how they're "our strategic trading partners," and in the next breath, threaten to send our military to fight them over a battle that isn't ours (Taiwan). More lunacy. Stay tuned.

I have been monitoring the "mainstream media" throughout the day and observed race baiters like Jesse Jackson, whose very financial existence depends on pitting Americans against each other, scream and yell about the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court last night. Democrat pundits have wailed and movie stars have swooned over the very thought, never mind the fact, that the ever smirking Jr. new world order George Bush, will now occupy the White House. They needn't worry.

A side note: Judicial Watch (www.judicialwatch.org) has engaged an independent audit firm and has now begun a real hand count of all 67 counties in the State of Florida. I will be interested in seeing what number they come up with at the end. If you're a Democrat holding your breath over this, I wouldn't bet on this independent firm attempting to "discern the intent of the voter," count "pregnant chads," or manufacture votes for Gore. Gee, how come you haven't heard anything about this statewide recount from Dashing Dachele, Dan Blather, Tom Brokenjaw or Alec Baldwin?

My next comments aren't going to sit well with Republican party hacks and faithful, but it must be said because the conservative movement in this country needs a good slap across the face to wake them out of their stupor. Today, Joseph Farah, worldnetdaily.com, gave his usual astute commentary about the state of affairs and made this comment about Wb'ya:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/20001213_xcbtl_putting_it.shtml**

    "And that brings me to President-elect George W. Bush. He was not my choice for the presidency. I did not vote for him. I publicly stated I could not vote for him because he does not understand nor respect the principle of constitutional limited government. I wish him the best...

    "Based on his personality and his past performance as Texas governor, I believe he is going to bend over backwards to be conciliatory, to govern by consensus, to reach out and make friends with people who will never be his friends and ideas that are bad for America.

    "I'm going to make one promise myself: For those of you who would like me and my news organization to offer a honeymoon to the new administration, you will be greatly disappointed. There will be no safe harbor for bad government -- no matter if it is perpetrated by Democrats or Republicans, conservatives or liberals. Not here. Not on these pages."

                                            * * *

    I know that Republicans across this country took up the chant earlier this year: Hold your nose and vote: Anyone but Gore. "We have to vote for George Bush whether we like him or not, he is the lesser of two evils." Same old rat race. Same old grassroots waiting around until the shadow government makes their selection to carry on the agenda of the power monsters behind the scenes and then shoving it down the throats of conservatives. I wrote about this in Media Bypass back in March, 1998:

http://www.devvy.com/ar00002.html

Will the "party faithful" never learn? Will they never get out of their state of blind loyalty to the Republican party "at all costs," including flushing the United States of America down the rat hole?

The Democrats need not worry about G.W. Bush. Junior is not going to upset the apple cart. He is not going to get on nationwide television January 21st and mount a major drive to "interfere with women's reproductive rights," or demand Roe v. Wade be overturned. I watched the hoax they called debates where the two "main" candidates exchanged spit and never once touched on the real problems undermining our sovereignty and raping our nation blind. Bush agreed with Gore that the U.S. should have gone to Somalia, Panama, Bosnia and of course, the Gulf War.

Bush agreed with Gore that we must have foreign aid. Bush chanted, like a mirror twin of Red Al, that all seniors in America should have "free" prescription medication. Bush agreed with Al that social security must be saved, medicare must be saved and our national defense should receive more funding.

Why the military has been gutted over the last eight years seems to have gone unnoticed by Mr. Bush: The Republicans have held the majority in Congress for the past five years. With a straight party vote in both the house and the unlawfully seated senate, coupled with a good number of Democrats who actually believe in the importance of our military, these cowardly Republicans could have adequately funded the military and over ridden any veto by Billy Clinton. Instead, with enough hand wringing, dawdling and politicking, the Republicans played ball with a man who has unequivocally sold out the United States of America to the Communist Chinese and Russians. These people are not our friends, folks. The Republicans have also successfully fooled you into thinking it was "the other side" that blocked Republican efforts to properly fund our military. What pure horse crap.

With the exception of a few musical chairs exchanged during this illusion they called an "election," the House of Representatives is still filled with the same disingenuous, weak-kneed socialists. The senate is unlawfully seated and have no authority to even draw a paycheck. If these 535 cretins refused to address the constitutional issues sitting like a Goliath in front of the American cattle, what makes anyone think that misfits like Mad Max Waters or traitorous dogs like Diane Feinstein or phonies like Tom DeLay are actually going to come clean this time around? If you don't get it before marriage, don't expect it afterwards and that is reality, Republicans.

Wb'ya chirped, along with his "opponent," that Americans should get tax breaks. Red Al said Americans shouldn't get a tax break at the risk of hurting this illusion touted as a "balanced budget." This new president-elect says he trusts the American people. He sure does, he trusts the people so much, he won't even tell them the truth about the IRS. The tree-hugging psycho, who I think belongs in a straight-jacket, bleated how America is a better nation because of "her diversity," while embracing every abnormal and destructive social behavior under the sun. Our new "great conciliator," will perform the same circus tricks, they'll just be labeled something new this time around.

Wb'ya, pandered to the "Latino" vote and played political patty cake with the sodomites and lesbians. Why, Georgie has even had his mouthpieces and operatives throw out trial balloons that he's going to have Democrats in his cabinet. The great conciliator, bringing America together. That's all well and fine, unfortunately, like Gore would have done, the game plan is to bring America into a homogeneous one world government, no borders, no sovereignty, no freedom and while they will never admit it to their dyding day: both parties are complicit in this monstrous and evil goal.

Under this new administration, will we see the Republican controlled White House, House of Reps and unlawfully seated senate stick to the status quo, which is of course, keep on a straight line to this Godless new world order. Not once did we hear from either of these two candidates about the real problems plaguing this country or any solutions, i.e.:

Get rid of this central banking system. America has no prosperous economy. Our economy is based on massive consumer debt. Debt has never been prosperity. The whole damn thing is nothing but one gigantic illusion. What we're gonna get is Wb'ya's undying loyalty to the international banking cartel and a continuance of the hijacking of our economy, our nation's lifeblood, by the "FED." Db'ya will fill his cabinet with CFR insiders and dangerous people like Colin Powell.

Wb'ya says he's all for a tax cut. How about coming clean about the voluntary income tax? Not a snowball's chance in Hell.

Think Wb'ya will lift a finger to help expose the lie about the 16th Amendment? Only in your dreams.

The 17th Amendment? Never!

Wb'ya is a Rockefeller Republican, make no mistake about it. Think he would even dream of proposing the U.S. withdraw from the insidious, communist controlled UN? In a pig's ear. Think Wb'ya cares one whit that all these international treaties in place that are killing this nation and her people? It never once disturbs his sleep.

The EPA, ATF & FDA all derive their jurisdiction from international treaties. They are bad for America. Think Wb'ya will propose Congress do anything about this wee little problem? Not hardly. Wb'ya only wants to strengthen these agencies. NAFTA & GATT gutting America's job base? Forget it, Wb'ya has made it very clear he's for "free trade."

Both Red Al & Junior are going to "save social security." It can't be done, period and I've written extensively about this hoax on this web site.

Is there any constitutional justification for the Federal Department of Education? Nope, not a single word in Art. 1, Sec. 8. Wb'ya wants to pour more money into a system that will never work to do anything other than dumb down the population.

The list is endless, but do not look to the Republicans in Congress or the White House to do one single thing about these critical issues other than feed the monster. After all, isn't that what the people of this country "mandated" this last "election" by allegedly voting a 50/50 split between the Democrat agenda and the Republican agenda? I've already said it in a prior piece: What's the difference between the two parties? About 530 votes. If there was something close to an accurate vote last month, it simply means that we have a nation of people who can't earn a living without some form of government check (state, federal, county), a lazy population that wants government to handle them from sperm to worm and a population that is willingly embracing socialism. Strong words? How else can I look at this?

Today on the Communist news network [CNN], the financial segments continually regurgitated that the market wanted Bush all along and "we could see a Bush surge." Well, of course, the market wants Wb'ya: He's one of them and will do nothing to upset the status quo despite all his unconstitutional promises. For those of you who pay no attention to the constitutional restrictions placed upon the office of the President, let me again remind you what Art. II, Sec. 2 of the U.S. Constitution says: The president can veto legislation, be commander-in-chief during a time of war, negotiate treaties that must be ratified by a lawfully seated senate.

The president has the power to glad-hand around the world and nominate, not seat, candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court (they must be confirmed by a lawfully seated senate which we do not have). The president can appoint ambassadors, etc., and fill up "all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session." (This is what Clinton used to appoint the current racist as head of the Civil Rights division back there in DC.) The president shall from time to time give Congress information on the state of the Union. He may, "on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses" and finally Sec. 4, describes the manner in which a scallywag can be thrown out of the White House. Far cry from the moon, sun, earth and the stars promised by both Al and Junior.

People should remember this little gem from Clinton's former Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich:

USA Today, January 7, 1999:

       "The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant." Reich cut to
        the chase when he said that "America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan
        Greenspan  and the Federal Reserve and America's foreign policy is now being
        run by the International Monetary Fund [IMF]." And, "...when the president decides
        to go to war, he no longer needs  a declaration of war from Congress."

Well, that pretty much sums it up and it's just a reaffirmation of what I have been saying for years: Congress has rendered themselves impotent through all these treaties and allowing president after president since FDR to simply circumvent the Constitution using executive orders. These presidents are nothing more than a thinly disguised Monarchy ensconced on Pennsylvania Ave. The rest of this horse and pony show conducted by Congress everyday is nothing more than an illusion for public consumption. Reality isn't easy to digest sometimes, but if the people know the truth, perhaps they will finally get off their duffs and work to stop the destruction of our beloved Republic - before it's too late.

Wb'ya will carry on the agenda of the globalists, he just won't be as blatant as the crew packing up, heading out and leaving behind the continuation of a mess begun back in 1913, 1933, 1935 and 1964. Mark my words. This commentary isn't to take away hope or get everyone depressed, it's to hopefully drive home the point that there isn't a nickel's worth of difference between these two "main" parties any longer. It's one of the reasons Larry Becraft and I formed The Wallace Institute and are pursing legal remedies in a very thoughtful, methodical manner. If people think this 50-50 split in the unlawfully seated senate was the result of some honest vote, well, those folks need to do some research on vote fraud and how this game is really played.

The Enemy From Within

Our gal, Hillary, so very popular among women for her stand on "protecting women's reproductive rights," "partial-birth abortion" [infanticide] and support of lesbians, was real busy when she wasn't an elected official. Of course, she isn't one now. I believe without question that she was vote frauded into office, but more importantly: Since the 17th Amendment was never properly ratified by the states of the Union, little miss progressive has no authority to sit in the United States Senate. Let's turn back the clock and remember what our modern gal was up to a few years back:

I have in my possession, as do millions of Americans who have done the research, the following document obtained and reproduced from the National Archives: Memorandum for Walter Zellman from Sallyanne Payton, clearly marked: Preliminary Draft for Official Use Only. Do Not Quote or Release For Any Purpose, page 4, Health Care Task Reform under Hillary Clinton:

        "(b) may the federal government use other actors in the governmental system and
        the private sector as its agents and give them orders as though they were parts of a
        prefectorial system? The short answer is "no." State governments are independent,
        although subordinated, sovereignties, not subdivisions of the federal government.

        "Although the federal government may regulate many of their functions directly [as well,
        for example, it subjects state water districts to the Clean Water Act], it may not require
        them to exercise their own governmental powers in a manner dictated by federal law. The
        states may be encouraged, bribed or threatened into entering into joint federal state programs
        of various sorts, from unemployment insurance to Medicaid; but they may not be commanded
        directly to use their own governmental apparatus in the service of federal policy. There is a
        modest jurisprudence of the Tenth Amendment that seems to have settled on this proposition.
        See the DOJ [Dept. of Justice] memorandum for a fuller elaboration."

So, what were Hillary's minions saying? That the government can bribe the states, they can threaten them but in fact, the states cannot be forced to get down on their knees to the federal machine. Mrs. Clinton and Congress blew $30 million dollars and almost two years on creating a "national health care" candy store. Recall the words of the attorney who wrote the material above about there being a "modest jurisprudence of the Tenth Amendment"? Let's see what the U.S. Supreme Court said that made Hillary and her cohorts attempt to skirt the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution:

Linder v. U.S. 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S. Ct 446 (1925): "Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government." That's the Tenth Amendment restrictions the court is talking about. Besides the Second Amendment, it's the one Congress and the White House hate and fear the most.

U.S. v Anthony, 15 F Supp. 553, 555 (S.D. Ca., 1936) and U.S. v. Evers, 453 F. Supp. 1141, 1150 (MD., Ala., 1978), the court ruled: "...the direct control of medical practice has been left to the states." Do you see the deception bing practiced here by these Marxist's in the White House and Congress? This latest malarkey Clinton calls "The Taxpayer Bill of Right's" is just more fuzzy, feel good stuff for which there isn't a scintilla of constitutional authority or enumeration by the federal government for enforcement. Everyone will benefit from enforcement of the Tenth Amendment and leave medical practice to the states where it belongs.

If you are a Democrat, I hope you will pay attention to the following and do something about it, unless, of course, you are one of the millions who have now embraced socialism disguised as "liberalism."

Democratic Socialists of America

57 Members of the U.S. Congress Betraying our Republic

This is one of the most egregious outrages in this country today, yet the majority of Americans are unaware of this heinous conduct by 57 sitting members of the U.S. Congress to overthrow our legal form of government. No, not through an armed revolution but rather, like the evil of Communism, these people do it through brain washing and deliberately breeding America to dependence on government welfare programs like a pusher who keeps his victim addicted.

America is a sovereign Republic. We are not a democracy. A democracy is mob rule and that mentality was displayed on December 10, 1998 during the prepackaged horse and pony show called "Impeachment Hearings." Congressman Howard Berman [D-CA] said that Congress could not impeach a president without the will of the people! How preposterous!

What happened to the rule of Law, Mr. Berman? Berman's brain cavity wouldn't even make a good drinking up for a hummingbird. Impeachment hearings are just that, or, an inquest if you will. An impeachment trial then goes on to the senate, presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Berman's ignorance isn't surprising if you've done enough homework as I have about the real agenda of the people behind the scenes who jerk the strings of Congress and the White House. And, no, it's not some silly conspiracy theory. The proposed take- over of America is right out in the open for anyone to see and read in thousands of documents, treaties and the voting patterns of Congress. This is what I do, seven days a week for almost nine years without any financial compensation. I know what I'm talking about.

Tens of thousands of gallons of blood has been spilled by hundreds of thousands of Americans to keep our nation free. To keep our Constitution and Bill of Rights as the supreme law of the land, instead of the Communist Manifesto. Communism should be hated by Americans, yet Americans purchase so much junk from Communist China, that our trade balance with these butchers is now over $400 billion dollars.

Sadly, most Americans don't even have a clue as to what this means to the economy and welfare of our country. How the Commies must be laughing themselves silly over America's stupidity. Too many Americans know only welfare in the form of social programs, handed out by Congress without a scintilla of constitutional authority.

There are more than 7,000 slave labor camps in Communist China and the blood from these poor souls probably made the blouse or slacks members of Congress parade around in - shame! Not me, not my family. We buy Made in the USA or go without and believe me, with the exception of some computer parts we can only get from Japan, we go without.

This is not isolationism as we frequently hear chanted by the media mouth pieces and Congress, it is called protectionism. Every country on this earth protects it's job base and we had better start doing the same because the next 10,000 jobs that go to Communist China, Communist Viet NAM, Communist South Africa, Sri Lanka or the Phillippines just might be yours.

Anyone who seeks to undermine the sovereignty of the United States or overthrow our legal form of government should, and usually are, charged with sedition. Not the 57 members of Congress who are actively working to overthrow our form of government. No? If you are on the Internet, go to: www.dsausa.org which is the web site for the Democratic Socialists of America and for those who just can't get to a computer, let me give you the exact text off the main page of their web site:

The Organization

"The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal affiliate of the Socialist International (also in Francais and Espanol). DSA's members are building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and politics.

At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end. We are activists committed not only to extending political democracy but to demanding democratic empowerment in the economy, in gender relation, and in culture. Democracy is not simply one of our political values but our means of restructuring society.....

In this web site you can find out about DSA, its politics, structure and program. DSA's political perspective is called Where We Stand. It says in part:

We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo. We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of resources, meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and racial equality and non-oppressive relationships."

Sounds all warm and fuzzy doesn't it? How many Americans understand what "sustainable growth" means? They should, it's destroying the autonomy of the states faster than a NY minute. DSA also has a youth section so they can do what Hitler did: turn children into killers. DSA, in their own words: "...to advance the cause of Socialism." Do you know what Adolph Hitler had to say about democracy? While I am loathe to quote a monster like him, those who ignore history are doomed to repeat and relive it:

    "The democracy of western countries is the predecessor of Marxism, which would be unthinkable without democracy. Democracy provides the nourishing soil for this world disease; the plague spreads from this ground."

    "Anti-Semitism is a useful revolutionary expedient. My Jews are a valuable hostage given to me by democracy."

I encourage everyone to read a book titled, The Voices of America's Destruction by Jeri Lynn Ball. [order: 1-877-291-1000] I guarantee you, once you read this meticulously researched book, see the comparisons of speeches by Adolph Hitler and Bill & Hill Clinton, you will see this government through different eyes. Of course, most Americans won't because they are like zombies, mesmerized every night in front of the television set watching mindless drivel. America will rue the day very soon because her people put garbage like Friends, The X-Files, sports, booze and drugs before any concern for their freedom.

If there is one single issue that Bill Clinton and Al Gore should be driven out of office, it is the selling of our most secret and sensitive technology to the Communist Chinese, our mortal enemy. Make no mistake about it, this is as serious as a full blown heart attack and it has made America very vulnerable and unnecessarily put our military at grave risk. No?

I urge you to read, The Year of The Rat by Michael Timperlake & William C. Triplett as well as their other books. No, they are not members of the vast right wing conspiracy; these two courageous men have very impressive credentials. Like me and you, they are very, very worried about the security of our country. Their book is so well documented and takes the reader, step by step, times, dates, places and the people involved.

Sometimes I just want to throw up my hands and say, "America, you deserve exactly what you're going to get." But, I can't. I love my country and I have to keep trying to reach as many people as I can and I hope and pray you will do the same. You can order their book on the net through www.Amazon.com or ask your local bookseller to order it.

There can be no question that The Democratic Socialists of America's agenda is to overthrow our legal form of government. It is a travesty that we have an alcoholic lesbian as an Attorney General, Janet Reno, who, from the mouths of her own staff if put under oath, was probably drunk when she ordered the gassing and burning of almost 100 men, women and children at Waco. Strong words? Not when you have done your homework. Another excerpt from the web site of the Democratic Socialists of America:

Now you begin to understand why a controlled vote is a necessity to get gets these anti- American, and by their own admission, socialists, "elected" to the U.S. Congress. Where is your outrage, America? Fifty-seven members of the United States Congress are connected like an umbilical cord with this subversive organization. Are you going to sit back and allow them to do this to our country? I guess so.

Actually, with the joke we call elections, it is rather difficult to vote anyone out of office anymore- all members of the Progressive Caucus - socialists - "reelected." Sure. Please help to educate everyone you know, people in your church, your union and all across this country. Let our voices be heard before it's too late - and we're getting close. Who are these members of Congress working to overthrow our Republic? They are all Democrats who proudly proclaim their membership in the Progressive Congress, they are:

Earl Hilliard [AL], Eni Faleomavaega [AS-AL], Ed Pastor [AZ], Lynn Woolsey [CA], George Miller [CA], Nancy Pelosi [CA], Pete Stark [CA], Henry Waxman [CA], Xavier Becerra [CA], Julian Dixon [CA], Esteban Torres [CA], "Mad Max" Maxine Waters [CA], George Brown [CA], Bob Filner [CA], Diane DeGette [CO], Corrine Brown [FL], Carrie Meek [FL], Alcee Hastings [FL], Cynthia McKinney [GA] - I think she was just redistricted out, John Lewis [GA], Neil Abercrombie [HI], Patsy Mink [HI], Jessie Jackson, Jr [IL}, Luis Gutierrez [IL], Danny Davis [IL], Lane Evans [IL], Julia Carson [IN], John Oliver [MA], Jim McGovern [MA], Barney Frank [MA], John Tierney [MA], David Bonier [MI], Lynn Rivers [MI], John Conyers [MI], Bennie Thompson [MS]

Melvin Watt [NC], Donald Payne [NJ], Jerrold Nadler [NY], Major Owens [NY], Nydia Velazquez [NY], Charles Rangel [NY], Jose Serrano [NY], Maurice Hinchey [NY], John LaFalce [NY], Marcy Kaptur [OH], Dennis Kucinch [OH], Louis Stokes [OH] just retired, Sherrod Brown [OH], Elizabeth Furse [OR], Peter DeFazio [OR], Chaka Fattah [PA] gone, William Coyne [PA], Carlos Romero-Barcelo [PR-AL], Robert C. Scott [VA], Bernard Sanders* [VT], James McDermott [WA]

Sanders is the only "independent" in Congress. If I remember correctly, Sanders ran on the Socialist ticket in '92 and was allegedly defeated, then ran as an "independent" in '94 and has been there ever since. He is as Red as Red Square in Moscow or Tienneman Square in Communist China. I do not believe that a constitutional and freedom loving state like Vermont would elect a socialist to Congress, no way.

Each and every one of these people took a solemn oath to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States. They cannot uphold that oath and be socialists at the same time. The two are not compatible. In my book, they are guilty of lying under oath, but, hell, why not? The President of the United States does it so why not them? Can you see the pattern here?

I have watched Congress on C-SPAN and all the talking head shows for years and years. I have watched every single one of those listed above and each time they open their mouths, I am amazed at the stupidity and un-American, anti-American, destructive ideology that they chant on a daily basis. Marcy Kaptur became the darling of the anti-free trade sector of our population - all except me - I knew she was a member of the Progressive Caucus and what they their real agenda was/is: the overthrow of our legal form of government. Where's your voice, America?

                                * * *
There is major, serious work that needs to be done in this country and if you think I'm kidding (no pun intended), let me leave you with this:

The following excerpt is from the 700 pages of transcripts re: In 1978 the legislature of Illinois created a committee to study regional governance - one of the key mechanisms to erasing our sovereignty and bringing America into a Communist "New World Order." There were three hearings, April 11, 1978, July 10, 1978 and September 26, 1978; the following statement is from the September 26, 1978 hearing.

This is the testimony of Norman Dodd, chief investigator in 1953 for U.S. Congressman B. Carroll Reece, whose committee investigated tax-exempt foundations run by the biggest traitors in this nation. This investigation eventually narrowed down to about 10 foundations, those chief among them for Un-American activities were Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie and the Rhodes Scholarship Fund. No? I invite you to do your homework. Did you know that Cecil Rhodes was one of the original white supremacists? Oh yes he was. In his will he spoke of eliminating all but the superior white race and working towards eliminating all minorities. If I were Bill Clinton, Robert Reich, George Stephannoplous, just to name a few, I would be ashamed to be a "Rhodes Scholar."

Transcript of Public Hearing, Joint Committee on Regional Government, September 26, 1978, Edwardsville, Illinois, Norman Dodd, page 51, "Mr. Chairman. After listening to the very able descriptions of how complex the question that is before the Committee is, I have been thinking in terms of drawing on my own experiences that relate to the development of the proposal called 'regional government'...As a result of that investigation [into tax exempt foundations], experiences began to accrue and one of them stemmed from the entity - or the head of the entity - responsible for the proposition which you all now face called regional government. This individual was the head of the Ford Foundation, and this experience took place back in 1953. It took the form of an invitation from the President of the Ford Foundation to me to visit the Foundation's offices, all of which I did and on arrival, was greeted by the President of the Ford Foundation with this statement:

"Mr. Dodd, we have invited you to come to NY and stop in and see us in the hope that, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress of the U.S. should be interested in an operation such as ours." Before I could think of just exactly how I would reply, Mr. Gaither volunteered the following information, and these are practically in his exact words: "Mr. Dodd, we operate here under directives which emanate from the White House. Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?" I said, "Indeed, I would, Mr. Gaither." Whereupon he then said the following: "We here, operate and control our grant making policies in harmony with the directives, the substance of which is as follows: We shall use our grant making power so to alter life in the U.S. that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."

Page 53: Now, the second experience that I would like to share with you, oh, and incidentally, it is the Ford Foundation's grants which are responsible for the formulation of this idea of regional government, and also the idea that given regional government, we must, in turn, develop and accept and agree to a totally New Constitution which has already been drawn up, as was mentioned just a few minutes ago.

[Editorial note: Let me leave Mr. Dodd's testimony for a moment. I have a copy of the New States Constitution, developed many, many years ago and refined in 1978 by the Center for Democratic Studies, a Rockefeller funded operation. This New States Constitution is to replace ours. Ask former Senatorette Nancy Kassenbaum, now married to Howard Baker - she helped draft this document. However, first a Constitutional Convention must be called and the globalists are desperate to pull a con-con.

They tried and failed in 1994, they will try again soon. Did you notice during the 105th Congress, each session these people continued to call for a Constitutional Amendment for virtually every major piece of legislation, i.e. a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, a balanced budget amendment [another meaningless, phony ploy], an amendment to the Constitution for school prayer, for victim's rights, to fix the IRS? This is unprecedented in this century.

The last Constitutional Convention was in 1787. We've passed 16 Amendments to the Constitution without a con-con, so why all of a sudden do we need one for all the legislation listed above? We don't, but it's the only way they can throw out our Constitution and replace it with this Communist doctrine called a New States Constitution.]

Back to Mr. Dodd's testimony beginning on pg. 53, Mr. Dodd is speaking about looking at the minutes and records of the Carnegie Endowment: "Mr. Dodd, we have received your letter. We can answer all the questions, but it will be a great deal of trouble. The reason it will be a great deal of trouble is because, with the ratification by the Senate of the U.S. of the United Nations Treaty, our job was finished, we bundled up our records, spanning, roughly speaking, fifty years and put them in the warehouse."

I did send a member of my staff to NY to read the minute books of this organization since it"s inception in 1908. Now, we are back in the period of 1908, ad these minutes reported the following: The Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment bring up a single question, namely, if it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more efficient than war to gain that end? And they discuss this very question at a very high academic and scholarly level for a year, and they come up with an answer - there are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people."

[Editorial note:  Remember, Mr. Dodd is now quoting from the Carnegie Foundation's own meeting minutes, page 55: "....oh, before that, the Trustees then answered the question of how to involve us in a war by saying, "We must control the diplomatic machinery of the U.S."; and then that brings up the question of how to secure that control, and the answer is we must control the State Department. Now, at that point, research discloses a relationship between the effort to control the State Dept. and an entity which the Carnegie Endowment set up, namely the Council of Learned Societies [editorial note: Later followed by the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]. And through that entity, are cleared all of the appointments - high appointments in the State Department and they have continued to be cleared that way since then.]

Now, finally, we are in a war. Eventually the war is over, and the Trustees turn their attention, then, to seeing to it that life does not revert in this country to what it was prior to 1914; and they hit upon the idea that in order to prevent that reversion, they must control education in this country. They realized that this is a perfectly tremendous, really stupendous and complex task - much too great for them alone. So, they approached the Rockefeller Foundation, with the suggestion that the task be divided between the two of them.

The Carnegie Endowment takes on that aspect of education which is a domestic in its relationship. These two run along in tandem that way, disciplined by a decision - namely, that the answer lies entirely in the changing of the teaching of the history of the U.S. They then approached five of the most prominent historians in this country with the proposition that they alter the manner of the teaching of the subject, and they get turned down flatly; so they realized then they must build their own stable of historians, so to speak.

They approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which specializes in Fellowships, and suggests to them that when they locate a relatively young potential historian, will the Guggenheim Foundation give that person a Fellowship, merely on their say-so and the answer is, yes they will.....And that becomes the policy which if finally picked up and manifests itself in the expression of collectivism all along the line, of which the dividing of this country into regions, using all of the logic which supports the ultimate idea that in order that regional government, in turn, be effective, there must be a new Constitution of the United States." End of quote.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are almost there, delivered right into their hands by a lazy, self-centered, apathetic American populace. I, for one, am begging Americans to turn off the tv and turn your full attention to what's going on right in front of your face if you'll just take the time to read the truth.

Our children, our future, our most precious gift, what is the public cesspool system doing to your children? How much longer are Americans going to keep buying into "we need more money for education?" All the money in the world isn't going to teach your children to read, write and spell - not in the government school system. Outcome Based Education is another nefarious mechanism to literally dumb down your children - believe these words. No? Are you willing to bet your child's future because it's easier just to send them off to strangers for half the day and allow them to fill your child's head full of New World Order doctrine?

Let me quote from a tremendous work titled America 2000/Goals 2000 - Moving the Nation Educationally to a New World Order; I have this manual which is over 600 pages and contains all the documented proof of the following:

    "The restructure of America's educational system is in reality, a restructure of the nation through the educational system. The proposed restructure program of the U.S. educational system closely resembles the International/Global educational program of the United Nations and is clearly socialistic in concept. Outcome based/mastery learnings, a whole "new" innovative approach to education as proposed by the Dept. of Ed, was implemented in Eastern Europe [and Communist China and Communist Russia. A close study of the restructure program reveals an interlock with a small, but dedicated body of people - like the Clinton's and Gingrich's - who have consistently worked to establish a single world government or New World Order." End of quoted segment.

Wake Up, fellow Americans. Take control of your parties and get rid of the shadow leadership who continue to pull the strings at the highest levels of your party. Help rid this nation of vote fraud. Loudly reject electronic ballot machines.

Nullification of the Bill of Rights

On December 7, 1941, almost 5,000 Americans were brutally murdered by the Japanese. Americans went to war. By the thousands they lined up to fight to preserve and protect what so many had died to give us. On the wall in my office is a poster. The American flag is tattered, blowing in the wind; big clouds of black smoke fills the background. The words at the top of this poster say: "We here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain." At the bottom it reads: Remember December 7th!

I remember, even though I have never been to war. I remember Italy, Anzio, Baatan, Guadacanal, Wake Island, Vietnam, Laos, Korea, Somalia, Bosnia and a thousand other places I've never been. All wars orchestrated by the international bankers. The push by the Masters of the Game - the New World Order architects - is to crush any patriotism in this country. Embrace "globalism," erase sovereignty, embrace slavery disguised as "democracy," repudiate a Constitutional Republic.

Americans today are allowing these precious freedoms to slip right away without a whimper. The Bill of Rights is the only protection we have for personal freedom and liberty. Yet, federal judges are now subverting our rights and magically turning them into privileges.

A privilege is something that can be taken away. Our rights, given to us by God cannot be taken away. During the O.J. Simpson trial, America watched Mark Furhman sit on the witness stand and utter the words, "I assert my Fifth Amendment privileges." For years, federal judges nationwide have taken it upon themselves to constantly refer to our rights as privileges. Balderdash! Congress should long ago have cleaned up the federal judiciary raining terror down on the heads of Americans and it absolutely is one of the ten greatest failures of Congress over the past 100 years.

The biggest propaganda machine and brainwashing tool of the globalists, the television, has been in full use for years. Take one episode of Law & Order, April 30, 1997, where the defense attorney tells his client, and the judge questions his client about giving up his Fifth Amendment "privileges." This phrase "Fifth Amendment privileges" was repeated a half dozen times in ten minutes. Brainwashing through repetition. Soon half of America will think that our Fifth Amendment Right is a privilege, just the same as half this country believes America's form of government is a democracy. What reprehensible lies and distortions dished up every night on the stupid tube.

In the Hickman case, let's see what the court said about your Second Amendment right: "The courts understanding follows a plain reading of the Amendment's text. The Amendment's second clause declares that the goal is to preserve the security of a 'free state'; its first clause establishes the premise that well-regulated militia are necessary to this end. Thus it is only in furtherance of state security that 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms' is finally proclaimed; [Footnote 6 in Hickman. No. 94-55836, DC. No CV-91-05594-RMT(Bx), Ninth Circuit Court, April 5, 1996.

The esteemed court also wrote: "The question presented at the threshold of Hickman's appeal is whether the Second Amendment confers upon individual citizens standing to enforce the right to keep and bear arms. We follow our sister circuits in holding that the Second Amendment is a right held by the states, and does not protect the possession of a weapon by a private citizen. We conclude that Hickman can show no legal injury, and therefore lacks standing to bring this action." Mother of God!

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says that the right of the people, to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. What part don't they understand? Where does it say in that sentence that it is the right of the state and not the individual? Hitler would have been proud of these judges. Did the Founding Fathers who wrote the Second Amendment intend for it to apply to states instead of the people?

Thomas Jefferson: "No free man shall ever be barred the use of arms." Did he say free state? No. Patrick Henry: "...the people have a right to keep and bear arms." Did he say the state has a right to keep and bear arms? No. Alexander Hamilton: "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." Did he say the state be properly armed? No. So just where did the Ninth Circuit come up with this distorted interpretation of the Second Amendment and more importantly, why are the people putting up with it by their silence?

Do you really believe that removing these inanimate objects [guns] will cure the social ills of America? You live in a dream world. Do you really believe that disarming America isn't the sole object of the White House and Congress? Let me quote from the Star Tribune, September 10, 1993, Scripps Howard Service article titled: Brady Bill Just One Small Step On Path To Disarm America: "The danger in all the good intent of the Brady bill is that it might end for the indefinite future, any prospect that Congress - from which not much is ever expected - would confront the real need to get rid of the handguns, to disarm America." The "liberal" media - Hitler must be smiling from Hell.

On March 11, 1992, Congressional Record, page H1168, Congressman Major Owens, a devout Communist masquerading as a Democrat, introduced legislation calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. In his oratory of ignorance he said, "Is the second amendment still necessary in 1992?" Perhaps Comrade Owens, and Sen. Comrade Charles Schumer should ask the survivors of Hitler's killing fields how important it is for the people to be armed? If you're on the Internet, I urge you to go to: www.geoffmetcalf.com and read the most comprehensive gun studies the media won't tell you about. Why? Because they clearly show that the better armed a community/population is, the lower the crime rate and that's a fact, Jack!

On May 1, 1997 I called the bill status room in Washington, DC to check on the status of HJ Resolutions 19, 38 & 51; all the same: Legislation to repeal the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and allow for unlimited terms for President. Yep. Paving the way for a totalitarian dictatorship. Can't happen here in America? Well, by God, it is and it's well under way!

State Department Publication 7277, which defines Public Law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act show the treason well underway, excerpt from 7277:

    "A world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the UN...the disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force."

Our troops are serving all over the world, getting killed and leaving America's shores unguarded and being replaced with UN forces? No? Read my other booklet, Why A Bankrupt America? Their words, not mine, will show you their hidden agenda. Yes, I guarantee you, I'd rather be fishing than reading all this treason, it's very scary. But wouldn't you rather know the truth?

On May 29, 1994, veteran Marines of Somalia, Panama or Haiti were given what is now called the "Twenty Nine Palms Survey," since Twenty Nine Palms, Ca., is the base where this questionnaire was given. What did it ask? Forty questions and I will give you two of those questions to our active duty military:

1. Do you agree or disagree that you are a UN fighting machine?

2. If Congress passed a law that said Americans could only own hunting type rifles and had to turn in all other guns, would you fire on an American who refused to give up their gun? A sickening 25% said they would shoot their fellow Americans. This was a test run. In 1995 & 1996, it was given to Air Force personnel.

Just how important is the Bill of Rights to you? The right to free speech, to worship as you please, to own and bear arms, your home can't be arbitrarily violated without a search warrant, just to name a few. Imagine these rights completely neutralized and considered privileges by the courts? Can't happen here? Consider this:

The U.S. Senate held hearings Nov. 18-Dec. 11, 1975 which exposed the on-going internment plan covered under The Emergency Detention Act of 1950, allegedly repealed in 1971. I say allegedly because it is apparent from the testimony given during the 1975 hearings, chronicled in the government report Intelligence Activities, Senate Revolution 21, Hearings before the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations, etc., that it remains the clear intent of the federal government to arrest, control and contain inhabitants of the U.S. who are considered "political dissidents."

Which means if you speak out against government tyranny, one day in the not too distant future, you'll be considered a "political dissident." No? I pray that Americans will reject, fully, completely and vocally, all these so-called "hate laws." They are nothing but a ruse to destroy your God-given rights. We already have enough laws on the books that deal with violence and crimes against individuals. "Hate laws" are the beginning of the end of free speech, plain and simple. Stand up now or forever be silenced by those who lust for power.

Shall I make it a little worse? Ever hear of a man by the name of John Stockwell? He was the Director of the CIA's Angola Task Force in the 1970s and is the highest ranking CIA officer ever to quit the agency and expose the truth of its operations to Congressional investigators. He wrote a book titled The Praetorian Guard and now has a follow-up titled, The Praetorian Guard: The U.S. Role in the New World Order. This guy is no Republican hater. You can believe or reject his words --after you read his books. It's pretty scary stuff. While I don't agree with him on some domestic issues, Mr. Stockwell is a bleeding-heart liberal, what he has to say is important. From his second book, section titled Ex-CIA Director, President George Bush, Sr., pg 20:

    "...Reagan put his and Meese's California friend Luis Guiffrida in charge of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which laid plans to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, and intern several hundred thousand people without due process...."

This is the bald-faced truth and that phony "Ollie" North was hip-deep in this chicanery against the American people.

Let's try this one on for size: Senate Report. No. 94-755, pg 19(d), April 26, 1976 states, "More importantly, the government's surveillance activities in the aggregate-whether or not expressly intended to do so, tends, as the committee concluded at Page 290 to deter the exercise of First Amendment rights by American citizens who become aware of the government's domestic intelligence program." I have in front of me the Master Warrant of Arrest detailed in this report.

I also have in front of me a document from the Department of Army, HQ, US Army Training and Doctrine Command, Fort Monroe, Va., 29 August 1994 titled: Draft Army Regulation on Civilian Inmate Labor Program and it is authentic. These are regs for the policies on civilian inmate utilization, procedures for preparing to establish civilian prison camps on installations, etc. Oh, heck, it's just something harmless and innocent, right? Do you remember the two men raided and arrested April 26, 1996 in Atlanta for allegedly having pipe bombs on their property so they could blow up the Olympics? They were Georgia militia members who spoke out against the increasing tyranny by our government against our people.

Few people know or understand what Posse Comitatus means. According to the FBI, the ATF, Congress and the White House it means nothing. This law for over a hundred years has protected US, you and me, from having the military be used against us like they do in foreign countries. They used the military against the people in Ruby Ridge and Waco. Mr. Starr and Mr. McCranie, the two militia members mentioned in the last paragraph, spoke out about these types of issues.

During their "trial," Agent Stephen W. Gillis of the ATF testified that the defendant, Robert Edward Starr III was not present when their own paid informant planted pipe bomb materials on his property. The agent also admitted that he did not know for sure whether Mr. Star was even aware the materials were there. This Agent Gillis also testified that Starr's co-defendant, William James McCranie had said, "I don't want to know anything about it" and walked away when the government's informant was talking about building bombs. Guess what? The mindless idiots on their jury found them guilty of making pie bombs and these two will spend the next 8-14 years in a federal prison. For what? Because they spoke out against the government? The ATF planted the bomb materials for God's sake! Wake up America.

FIJA stands for Fully Informed Jury Association. FIJA is a hated targed by judges all across this nation conducting a smear campaign against Americans who are interested in learning about this facet of our jury system. If you take the time to learn and understand your duties, responsibilities and rights as a juror, you're now automatically dismissed. If you listen to the wrong radio show you're now dismissed, if you subscribe to an "anti-government" media publication, you're out of there. This happened to Hoppy Heidelberg in the OKC Grand Jury. He went by the instruction booklet given to him by the court and when he tried to insure they went by the book, the judge gave him the boot. What are they so afraid of?

Today jurors are ask the most personal questions about themselves, their finances and their families. The judges and prosecution now seek to put empty heads on a jury, sheep who will not stand up and say no but hell no, this is wrong! The trend is now underway to do away with our God given, constitutional right to a jury and replace the system with "professional jurors." That's right! How long do you think it will take the globalists to figure out a way to get rid of jury trials altogether? They've already begun. In November 1998, allegedly the citizenry of Colorado voted to eliminate juries for capital crime cases! I don't believe it for a moment.

Steffen Bertsch was/is an attorney in the State of Washington, I say was because I think he's gone to Australia. For years he tried to educate Americans about the fraud being perpetrated by the IRS. In March 1997, a jury found 11-1 in favor of his client by finding that the IRS acted illegally in the seizure of his client's property. Knowing what such a jury decision could mean in exposing the fraudulent activities of the IRS, the judge simply set aside the jury decision calling it "advisory", dismissed the case and the IRS will re-try Steffen's client. Is there something wrong with this picture, America?

Have you ever heard the story about the frog in the pot of water? The cook puts the frog in a pot of cold water, sets the temperature on low. The frog feels no pain. Gradually the cook turns the hat up and as the pot grows warmer, the frog becomes a little uncomfortable, then a little more uncomfortable. Then one day, he discovers too late that he's now cooked. Do you get my meaning?

Our Sovereign Republic

Sadly, our sovereign Republic seems to mean nothing to so many - especially if it interferes with their "party" "winning at all costs." Of course this isn't surprising considering what the Federal Department of Socialist Education has been drumming into the heads of America's children for the past 30 years. They've been brainwashed into thinking America is a democracy. They're being taught everything but our heritage, our history and patriotism. It's all quite deliberate and well-thought out.

We used to have very loyal Americans serve in Congress. What did some of them say to try and warn US about the UN?

January 9, 1953, Senator John W. Bricker on Our Liberty Must be Guarded. This was a major discussion about the loss of our sovereignty and the passing of the UN Covenant of Human Rights. Bricker felt there wasn't much chance of getting it passed [this was before electronic ballot fraud started insuring no more loyal Americans would serve in Congress, only the corrupt, the ignorant and the supporters of globalism] but he nonetheless said:

    "But the Constitution should be amended now to forestall a loss of freedom to our children and to oncoming generations through the power of treaties and executive agreements designed to circumvent the Constitution."

How prophetic. Look at all these treaties Congress and past presidents have entered America into, i.e. NAFTA & GATT, Ramparts & Bio-Diversity treaties that literally are wiping out our Republic. How many Americans have even heard of these treaties, much less read them as I have done? Well, heck, can't miss an episode of Baywatch's bouncing breasts, ER , a sports game or Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. Better to keep the population drunk, addicted to porn, entertained, medicated, fed junk food and watered.

February 3, 1953, Congressman Burdick, asking the question, "Mr. Speaker, the subject I was going to speak on now and do speak on is: What can this country, the U.S. do to prevent the United Nations from destroying the Constitution of the United States of America and the constitution and laws of the various states of the Union?" The liberals and the government's media apparatus all chant that the UN is the answer to the world's problems of violence, terrorism and ethnic cleansing. What rubbish. What pure, undiluted propaganda.Do people get the meaning of the word "programming" as it relates to the TV set?

January 15,1962, Congressman Utt: "You can expect to see a one world government, Communist controlled, under the United Nations. You will see the United Nations run up astronomical debts, which we, under the terms of the treaty, are bound to pay."

Again, how prophetic because that's just where we are today. These quotes were taken from the Congressional Record. Twenty years ago, former Congressman John Rarick and later, Congressman Ron Paul [now back in Congress, R-TX] introduced bills to get US out of this Communist boys club. It will never happen until we fix our election system and get real constitutionalists elected and we educate our fellow Americans about the material on this web site and others beating the drum for America.

Only We the People can demand our state legislatures completely purge all existing voter rolls and restore the integrity of one of our most precious rights - the ballot box. If they refuse, please get out there and get these members of your state legislature recalled through a petition signature drive. It's done all the time. The establishment media hides it from you because they don't want you to know you have that power. On this web site is a document titled How to Recall Elected Public Servants. I have laid it out, step by step, for every level of state government. We have the tools, don't wait until it's too late to use them.

If you're having a difficult time with this material, which is just the tip of the iceberg, I urge you to read G. Edward Griffin's outstanding book, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the UN. There's a well documented dose of reality.

Another brave and courageous gentleman, former FBI agent, Cleon Skoussen, has written many fine works. Let me give you a quote from Mr. Skoussen's work:

    "Norman Thomas was the Socialist candidate for President in 1928; he lost...by 1953, Thomas, however, was jubilant. He wrote a pamphlet called Democratic Socialism in which he stated that '...here in America more measures once praised or denounced as socialist have been adopted than once I should have thought possible short of a socialist victory at the polls.'

"Under President Eisenhower, Thomas still found reasons to be jubilant. In the Congressional Record for April 17, 1958 (p. A-3080), Thomas is quoted as saying: 'The United States is making great strides toward Socialism under Eisenhower than even under Roosevelt [FDR], particularly in the fields of federal spending and welfare legislation.'

    "By 1962, Thomas summed up the whole situation as follows: 'The difference between Democrats and Republicans is: Democrats have accepted some ideas of Socialism cheerfully, while Republicans have accepted them reluctantly.' (Cleveland Plain Dealer, October 19, 1962)

    "Alfred E. Smith, Democratic Gov. of NY [4 terms], became the Democratic candidate for President in 1926, but lost to Herbert Hoover. In 1932, he supported FDR, but by 1936, he was so shocked and alarmed by what he saw happening that he decided to warn his party. On January 25, 1936, he gave a speech in Washington, DC to warn the American people that the Democratic Party was being betrayed." End of quotes.

The rock of truth is a lonely place to be sometimes. In the colonial era when America was in its infancy, Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale, Jefferson, Madison - they were called every name in the book, "radicals," "extremists" and so on. Today, those who stand up for the truth, for the Constitution, for America, we're all called the same names except the media has added a few like, "anti-government," "anti-Semitic," and so forth. However, the truth is the truth and no amount of name calling and vilification by the media or politicians will change the facts.

America, why are you sitting back and allowing our nation to be destroyed? Why don't you want the truth? My husband spent 27 years in the Army to keep you free. He could have been killed, crippled or maimed in Vietnam, Thailand or Germany. Will you so cavalierly toss aside his sacrifices and the sacrifices of 25 million other veterans who served to keep you free, because you just have to go to a museum or movie today instead of finding out what's really going on behind your back and then doing something about it?

Has the television set or a game of golf, or going to the gym or out to dinner become more important than saving our children's birthright and preserving the freedoms given to us by the spilling of tens of thousands of gallons of blood? I can't do it alone, we must all work together to bring about legal, peaceful change. Yes, we're all tired and worn out. But if we as a nation stood tall against this tyranny being rained down on our heads, the globalists won't stand a chance. Will you join the double digit millions of us in this battle to remain a free, sovereign nation? Will you stand up as those before you and shout to the world our cry for Freedom?

Our Founding Fathers didn't just stand up and shout. They walked away from their farms, business and families for you and your children's futures. They had their homes ransacked and burned to the ground. Brave men like Nathan Hale were betrayed by their own and hung by the neck. Many were shot by firing squads -- all to bring freedom to Americans. Please don't turn your back on our history, heritage and our tomorrows. Fight back.

**  12.22.02: Unfortunately, the URL from for worldnetdaily.com is now expired. They keep their material in their archives for a couple of years and then remove them. This is one of the reasons why I put the old material from this site onto a CD:

http://www.devvy.com/cdrom_sales.html